Allow me a moment’s fun on this. Analysis Finds Big Differences In School Textbooks In States With Differing Politics A New York Times analysis of social studies textbooks from California and Texas … California and Texas: Same textbooks, different history lessons. January 12, 2020 at 2:12 pm EST By Taegan Goddard Leave a Comment. Texas is more likely to celebrate free enterprise and entrepreneurs like Andrew Carnegie. New York Times: “The textbooks cover the same sweeping story, from the brutality of slavery to the struggle for civil rights. The self-evident truths of the founding documents to the waves of immigration that reshaped the nation.” “The books have the same publisher. California is critical of wealth inequality and the impact of companies like Standard Oil on the environment.

The California data are of poor quality, and even the Texas data (which we do not discuss here but are much better) leave something to be desired. Posted January 12 by spit-evil-olive-tips.
Over the weekend, my colleague Dana Goldstein published an in-depth analysis of American history textbooks used in California and Texas schools. But one’s a... 9 min, 49 sec Both California and Texas have tens of millions of residents (who are mostly minorities), booming economies, and the large markets for textbook publishers. Because of that, each state’s politics affects social studies curriculum across the …

§ 5000A) that created a tax penalty for Americans without insurance was eliminated. If they graduated with a reflexive suspicion of the concept of separation of church and state and an unexpected interest in the contributions of the National Rifle Association to American history, you know who to blame. California vs. Texas is a true culture clash of titans.

↩︎ The New York Times

… If you're interested in watching a good documentary about how Texas's textbooks are developed (and the impact those decisions have outside of the state), check out The Revisionaries. California and Texas textbooks sometimes offer different explanations for white backlash to black advancement after the Civil War, from Reconstruction to … Texas’s relative success is best measured against a peer: California.

They both have diverse populations, large numbers of … Textbooks. No matter where you live, if your children go to public schools, the textbooks they use were very possibly written under Texas influence. A comparison of American history textbooks from Texas and California. California Moves To Block Texas' Textbook ... My understanding was that this bill was intended to prevent the specific changes proposed by Texas from making it into California textbooks. That fear has already stoked a political backlash: One California state senator is drafting legislation to keep any hint of the Texas version of U.S. history out of California textbooks. Texas does not.
Comparing social studies textbooks customized for California and Texas illuminates America’s deepest partisan divides. In Texas, you get barbecue beef, Texas toast and hot peppers, which is as close as you get to a healthy vegetable. California and Texas are the most populous states. How Textbooks Differ In California and Texas.

You may not live as long, but you’ll have more fun eating.

Despite all the handwringing about Texas' influence on the textbook market nationally, it's just not so, publishing insiders say. But one’s a blue state, and the other is red. Both Texas and California volumes deal more bluntly with the cruelty of the slave trade, eschewing several myths that were common in textbooks for generations: that some slave owners treated enslaved people kindly and that African-Americans were better off enslaved than free.

Both California and Texas have tens of millions of residents (who are mostly minorities), booming economies, and the large markets for textbook publishers. Still, recent textbooks have come a long way from what was published in past decades. That is not leftist revisionism. In California, you get a salad filled with the freshest fruit and vegetables. California v. Texas (Docket 19-840) is a pending case before the United States Supreme Court dealing with the constitutionality of the 2010 Affordable Care Act following the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.With this law, the "individual mandate" (26 U.S.C. You live longer just by looking at it.