2. 28. The Earl of Oxford’s Case in Chancery. Edward de Vere, 17th earl of Oxford, English lyric poet and theatre patron, who became, in the 20th century, the strongest candidate proposed (next to William Shakespeare himself) for the authorship of Shakespeare’s plays. The concept of equity and its moral basis can be supported by Lord Ellesmere’s speech in the Earl of Oxford Case [1615] 1 Ch Rep 1, ‘correct men’s conscience for fraud, breaths of trusts, wrongs and oppressions … And to soften and mollify extremity of the law’. May be good enough between contracting parties, but not to 3rd party guarantor. The Case for Oxford. Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford (12 April 1550 – 24 June 1604) For all of the precise, detailed information on this matter, read Richard Wagner's book The LOST SECRET of William Shakespeare. The Earl of Oxford Case: equity prevails in conflict Fusion Fallacy Walsh v Lonsdale: Eng court held that lease under equity viewed as if lease had been granted Chan v Cresdon: HCA held that equitable right not equivalent to legal right. October 1991 Issue. Earl of Oxford's case (1615) 21 ER 485 is a foundational case for the common law world, that held equity (equitable principle) takes precedence over the common law.. Dead people simply do not write! Tom Bethell . Earl of Oxford's case (1615) 21 ER 485 is a foundational case for the common law world, that held equity (equitable principle) takes precedence over the common law. The Earl of Oxford’s case of 1615 occupies a rather unique position in the development of the English legal system and is frequently referred to as the corner stone of equity … Such is the case with Edward De Vere! I CHAN. REP. 5. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription. In Oxford's case peer pressure to hide his name would have been strong. Nor does the Law of the Land speak against him. THE EARL OF OXFORDS CASE. And Equity and good Consci~ncespeak wholly for him. 1. 3. Earl of Oxford's case (1615) 21 ER 485 is a foundational case for the common law world, that held equity (equitable principle) takes precedence over the common law. Evidence exists that Oxford was known during his lifetime to have written background to the Earl of Oxford case 1615. concerned parcel of land in London which Henry VIII had gifted to Thomas, who left the land to Magdalene College, Cambridge, who subsequently sold it and which was indirectly acquired by the Earl of Oxford. History has left us many clues indicating that Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, wrote plays and poetry under the pen name, “William Shakespeare.” Many people believe that these clues add up to a strong case for Oxford as the true author of Hamlet, King Lear, the Sonnets, and other works traditionally attributed to the man from Stratford. National Portrait Gallery, London / Wikimedia.
And now this Term it was argued, That the Defendants thus stand in^ in Contempt, &c., may be sequ~treduntil Answer. The Earl of Oxford's Case (1615), which is reported on the first page of the first volume of ... Access to the complete content on Oxford Reference requires a subscription or purchase. The Case for Edward de Vere as Shakespeare Paperback – June 29, 2015 ... Edward DeVere, 17th Earl of Oxford, is presented in thorough and responsible fashion as the likely author behind the obvious pseudonym. Were the works of Shakespeare really written by the Earl of Oxford? Earl of Oxford’s case (1615) 21 ER 485 is a foundational case for the common law world, that held equitable principle takes precedence over the common law. Link Copied. Deut.
brought by Henry de Vere (1593-1625), 18th Earl of Oxford, to establish his title to the great garden property as a whole in a court of equity. trust case summaries week earl of oxford case 1615 ch rep earl of case (1615) 21 er 485 is foundational case for the common law world, that held equity

The Law of God speaks for the Plaintiff. The two court systems coexisted uneasily until the Earl of Oxford?s Case (1615), when the King finally held that equity prevailed over the common law in the event of a conflict. It concerned the sale of land in Aldgate, London by the Master and Fellows of Magdalene College Oxford to the Crown, then by the Crown to Benedict Spinola, and by Spinola to the Earl of Oxford.